Audience member thanked Blimke for WebMock (which they had used since the first version) and asked whether he has considered building contract-testing support into WebMock or a companion library, since on their projects contract testing is how they learn when mocks are no longer valid. Blimke has not, but said stub-validation scope is constantly on his mind — WebMock's global registries make it hard today to say 'this mock is only valid in this scope or thread'. He hopes a future major version can reduce stub scope. The moderator translated the answer as 'he needs contributors'.